We can't say anything concrete about how Maria Vamvakinou voted on greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres
How Maria Vamvakinou voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws that ensure that the minister can control what items people are allowed to bring into Australia's immigration detention centres by, for example, passing laws that allow authorised officers to search both facilities and people and seize any prohibited items found
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres” which Maria Vamvakinou could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Maria Vamvakinou on this policy.
| Division | Maria Vamvakinou | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2018, 4:55 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres” which Maria Vamvakinou could have attended.
| Division | Maria Vamvakinou | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2018, 4:48 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't read the bill a second time |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Maria Vamvakinou has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.