Compare how Paul Fletcher and Kevin Rudd voted on re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
![Photo of Paul Fletcher](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10723.jpg)
Paul Fletcher
Liberal Party Representative for Bradfield since December 2009
![Photo of Kevin Rudd](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10552.jpg)
Kevin Rudd
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Griffith October 1998 – November 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which either Paul Fletcher or Kevin Rudd could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Fletcher and Kevin Rudd on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Paul Fletcher | Kevin Rudd | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
15th May 2013, 1:43 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which either Paul Fletcher or Kevin Rudd could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Paul Fletcher | Kevin Rudd | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
15th May 2013, 1:36 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process |
Yes | No | No |