We can't say anything concrete about how Lisa Chesters voted on increasing workplace protections for women
How Lisa Chesters voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase legal protections for women in the workplace, particularly in respect to sex discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Lisa Chesters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lisa Chesters on this policy.
| Division | Lisa Chesters | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Lisa Chesters could have attended.
| Division | Lisa Chesters | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Nov 2022, 4:05 PM – Representatives Anti-Discrimination and Human Rights Legislation Amendment (Respect at Work) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Extending protection |
absent | No |
9th Feb 2022, 4:11 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Teachers |
absent | No |
2nd Sep 2021, 1:10 PM – Representatives Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Implement the 55 recommendations |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lisa Chesters was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.