Summary

Edit

The majority voted in favour of amendments (1) to (10) and (12) to (27) on sheet ZC286, which were moved by Northern Territory Senator Malarndirri McCarthy (Labor). This means they were successful.

What do these amendments do?

To explain the purpose of these amendments, the Government released a supplementary explanatory memorandum, which explained that:

Review of operation of amendments

The proposed Government amendments insert a requirement for an independent review of measures introduced by the Bill and associated legislative instruments to commence no later than 1 July 2027.

This requirement addresses the concerns raised in the additional comments from Coalition Senators to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry’s Report on the Bill, that the Government has no quantifiable measures of success. This review provides an opportunity for the vaping reforms to be monitored and evaluated. Additionally, conducting such a review is consistent with the advice in the impact analysis on the proposed reforms to the regulation of vapes published on the Office of Impact Analysis website: www.oia.pmc.gov.au .

Retail possession offence and civil penalty provisions

The proposed Government amendments replace the offence and civil penalty provisions in the Bill for the possession of less than a commercial quantity of vaping goods (proposed section 41QD) with new, more targeted, offence and civil penalty provisions. The new provisions prohibit the possession of less than a commercial quantity of vaping goods by a retailer in retail premises in Australia. The purpose is to target deliberate dealings in small quantities of unlawful vaping goods by retailers. Consumers and individual users are not covered by these prohibitions.

An exception has also been inserted in the offence and civil penalty provisions for the possession of more than a commercial quantity of vaping goods (new section 41QC) if the vaping goods are for personal use. This amendment is to further reinforce that the purpose of the measures is not to penalise individual users.

Consent scheme

The Bill amends proposed a new section 41RC to require the Secretary to comply with decision-making principles (if any) when exercising the power to consent to applications to manufacture, supply or possess vaping goods. The proposed Government amendments would empower the Minister to make a legislative instrument to determine decision-making principles that the Secretary must comply with in making a decision to grant consent. This legislative instrument would be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny and disallowance.

The provision would respond to concerns raised by the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills about the conferral of a broad discretionary power on the Secretary.

Merits review of enforceable directions

The Bill provides that the Secretary may give directions to a person in prescribed circumstances. The proposed Government amendments specify that a person to whom directions are given may seek merits review of the decision by the Minister and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. This responds to a query from the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills about the availability of merits review.

Forfeiture

The proposed Government amendments ensure that the new forfeiture powers apply to vaping goods that were seized under warrant, and are in an authorised person’s custody, immediately before commencement of those powers. This will assist with the safe and orderly disposal and destruction of significant numbers of seized unlawful vaping goods.

Advertising provisions

The proposed Government amendments would remove the proposed Ministerial power to make a legislative instrument excluding advertisements to health practitioners, and certain other classes of persons, from the operation of the new advertising controls. This amendment addresses the concerns raised by certain Senators and stakeholders in the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry about the breadth of the exclusion in light of aggressive marketing practices of certain sponsors.

Offence and civil penalty provisions concerning breach of a condition

The proposed Government amendments would update the penalty regime in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (TG Act) for breach of a relevant condition of exemption, approval or authority to import or supply a medicine or medical device not included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (Register).

Supply of therapeutic goods by pharmacists with or without prescription

To facilitate greater patient access to therapeutic vaping goods under health practitioner supervision, the proposed Government amendments would down schedule nicotine in therapeutic vaping goods from Schedule 4 (prescription only medicines) to Schedule 3 (pharmacist only medicines) to the current Poisons Standard in specified circumstances with appropriate safeguards.

These amendments would allow a pharmacist to supply certain therapeutic vaping goods to an adult without a prescription from a medical or nurse practitioner provided certain conditions are met, including that the pharmacist provides professional advice to the patient on alternative cessation supports and therapies. The Government amendments would also propose to amend two other instruments to support the down scheduling of nicotine in certain therapeutic vaping goods.

Votes Passed by a small majority

Nobody rebelled against their party.

Party Votes
Australian Greens (91% turnout) 10 Yes 0 No
Penny Allman-Payne Queensland Yes
Dorinda Cox WA Yes
Mehreen Faruqi NSW Yes
Sarah Hanson-Young SA Yes
Steph Hodgins-May Victoria Yes
Nick McKim Tasmania Yes
David Shoebridge NSW Yes
Jordon Steele-John WA Yes
Larissa Waters Queensland Yes
Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania Yes
Barbara Pocock SA Absent
Australian Labor Party (76% turnout) 19 Yes 0 No
Tim Ayres NSW Yes
Catryna Bilyk Tasmania Yes
Carol Brown Tasmania Yes
Anthony Chisholm Queensland Yes
Raff Ciccone Victoria Yes
Lisa Darmanin Victoria Yes
Varun Ghosh WA Yes
Nita Green Queensland Yes
Karen Grogan SA Yes
Malarndirri McCarthy NT Yes
Deborah O'Neill NSW Yes
Fatima Payman WA Yes
Helen Polley Tasmania Yes
Louise Pratt WA Yes
Tony Sheldon NSW Yes
Glenn Sterle WA Yes
Jana Stewart Victoria Yes
Anne Urquhart Tasmania Yes
Murray Watt Queensland Yes
Don Farrell SA Absent
Katy Gallagher ACT Absent
Jenny McAllister NSW Absent
Marielle Smith SA Absent
Jess Walsh Victoria Absent
Penny Wong SA Absent
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price NT Country Liberal Party No
Andrew McLachlan SA Deputy President No
David Pocock ACT Independent Yes
Lidia Thorpe Victoria Independent Absent
David Van Victoria Independent Absent
Jacqui Lambie Network (100% turnout) 1 Yes 1 No
Jacqui Lambie Tasmania Yes
Tammy Tyrrell Tasmania No
Liberal National Party (100% turnout) 0 Yes 2 No
Matthew Canavan Queensland No
James McGrath Queensland No
Liberal Party (74% turnout) 0 Yes 17 No
Alex Antic SA No
Wendy Askew Tasmania No
Andrew Bragg NSW No
Slade Brockman WA No
Richard Colbeck Tasmania No
David Fawcett SA No
Sarah Henderson Victoria No
Jane Hume Victoria No
Maria Kovacic NSW No
Kerrynne Liddle SA No
Matt O'Sullivan WA No
Gerard Rennick Queensland No
Linda Reynolds WA No
Anne Ruston SA No
Paul Scarr Queensland No
Dave Sharma NSW No
Dean Smith WA No
Simon Birmingham SA Absent
Michaelia Cash WA Absent
Claire Chandler Tasmania Absent
Jonathon Duniam Tasmania Absent
Hollie Hughes NSW Absent
James Paterson Victoria Absent
National Party (75% turnout) 0 Yes 3 No
Ross Cadell NSW No
Susan McDonald Queensland No
Bridget McKenzie Victoria No
Perin Davey NSW Absent
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party (50% turnout) 1 Yes 0 No
Malcolm Roberts Queensland Yes
Pauline Hanson Queensland Absent
Sue Lines WA President Yes
Ralph Babet Victoria United Australia Party No
Totals (78% turnout) 33 Yes – 26 No