|
senate vote 2019-07-25#6
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2019-08-22 16:02:31
|
Title
Committees — Community Affairs References Committee; Reference- Committees - Community Affairs References Committee - Reference re: Newstart adequacy
Description
<p class="speaker">Rachel Siewert</p><p>I seek leave to amend business of the Senate notice of motion No. 1, standing in my name and the name of Senator Dodson for today, proposing a reference to the Community Affairs References Committee relating to income support payments.</p><p>Leave granted.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2019-07-25.73.2) introduced by WA Senator [Rachel Siewert](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/rachel_siewert) (Greens), which means it passed and the matters set out below will be referred to the [Community Affairs References Committee](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs).
- You can [keep track of the inquiry](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Newstartrelatedpayments) on the Committee's website.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the following matter be referred to the Community Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 27 March 2020:*
- >
- > *The adequacy of Newstart and related payments and alternative mechanisms to determine the level of income support payments in Australia, with specific reference to:*
- >
- >> *(a) consideration of what constitutes an acceptable standard of living in Australia, including the cost of safe and secure housing;*
- >>
- >> *(b) the labour market, unemployment and under-employment in Australia, including the structural causes of long term unemployment and long term reliance on Newstart;*
- >>
- >> *(c) the changing nature of work and insecure work in Australia;*
- >>
- >> *(d) the appropriateness of current arrangements for supporting those experiencing insecure employment, inconsistent employment and precarious hours in the workforce;*
- >>
- >> *(e) the current approach to setting income support payments in Australia;*
- >>
- >> *(f) the impact of the current approach to setting income support payments on older unemployed workers, families, single parents, people with disability, jobseekers, students, First Nations peoples, people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, people living in regional and remote areas, and any others affected by the process;*
- >>
- >> *(g) the impact of geography, age and other characteristics on the number of people receiving payments, long term unemployment and poverty;*
- >>
- >> *(h) the adequacy of income support payments in Australia and whether they allow people to maintain an acceptable standard of living in line with community expectations and fulfil job search activities (where relevant) and secure employment and training;*
- >>
- >> *(i) the economic cost of long-term unemployment, underemployment, poverty, inequality and inadequate income support payments;*
- >>
- >> *(j) the economic benefits – including job creation, locally and nationally – of increasing and improving income support payments and supports, and decreasing poverty and inequality;*
- >>
- >> *(k) the relationship between income support payment levels, minimum wages and wage stagnation in Australia and other comparable economies;*
- >>
- >> *(l) the interactions with other payments and services, including the loss of any increased payments through higher rents and costs;*
- >>
- >> *(m) the cost and fiscal sustainability of any changes;*
- >>
- >> *(n) the relative merits of alternative investments in health, education, housing and other programs to improve outcomes;*
- >>
- >> *(o) other countries' approaches to setting income support payments, minimum wages and awards;*
- >>
- >> *(p) other bodies that set payments, minimum wages and awards in Australia;*
- >>
- >> *(q) the role of independent and expert decision–making in setting payments; and*
- >>
- >> *(r) any other related matters.*
<p>I, and also on behalf of Senator Dodson, move:</p><p class="italic">That the following matter be referred to the Community Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 27 March 2020:</p><p class="italic">The adequacy of Newstart and related payments and alternative mechanisms to determine the level of income support payments in Australia, with specific reference to:</p><p class="italic">(a) consideration of what constitutes an acceptable standard of living in Australia, including the cost of safe and secure housing;</p><p class="italic">(b) the labour market, unemployment and under-employment in Australia, including the structural causes of long term unemployment and long term reliance on Newstart;</p><p class="italic">(c) the changing nature of work and insecure work in Australia;</p><p class="italic">(d) the appropriateness of current arrangements for supporting those experiencing insecure employment, inconsistent employment and precarious hours in the workforce;</p><p class="italic">(e) the current approach to setting income support payments in Australia;</p><p class="italic">(f) the impact of the current approach to setting income support payments on older unemployed workers, families, single parents, people with disability, jobseekers, students, First Nations peoples, people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, people living in regional and remote areas, and any others affected by the process;</p><p class="italic">(g) the impact of geography, age and other characteristics on the number of people receiving payments, long term unemployment and poverty;</p><p class="italic">(h) the adequacy of income support payments in Australia and whether they allow people to maintain an acceptable standard of living in line with community expectations and fulfil job search activities (where relevant) and secure employment and training;</p><p class="italic">(i) the economic cost of long-term unemployment, underemployment, poverty, inequality and inadequate income support payments;</p><p class="italic">(j) the economic benefits – including job creation, locally and nationally – of increasing and improving income support payments and supports, and decreasing poverty and inequality;</p><p class="italic">(k) the relationship between income support payment levels, minimum wages</p><p class="italic">and wage stagnation in Australia and other comparable economies;</p><p class="italic">(l) the interactions with other payments and services, including the loss of</p><p class="italic">any increased payments through higher rents and costs;</p><p class="italic">(m) the cost and fiscal sustainability of any changes;</p><p class="italic">(n) the relative merits of alternative investments in health, education,</p><p class="italic">housing and other programs to improve outcomes;</p><p class="italic">(o) other countries' approaches to setting income support payments, minimum</p><p class="italic">wages and awards;</p><p class="italic">(p) other bodies that set payments, minimum wages and awards in Australia;</p><p class="italic">(q) the role of independent and expert decision–making in setting payments;</p><p class="italic">and</p><p class="italic">(r) any other related matters.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is that business of the Senate matter No. 1 be agreed to.</p>
|