All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2017-12-04#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2017-12-17 16:07:57
|
Title
Bills — Fair Work Amendment (Repeal of 4 Yearly Reviews and Other Measures) Bill 2017; Third Reading- Fair Work Amendment (Repeal of 4 Yearly Reviews and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill
Description
<p class="speaker">Michaelia Cash</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That this bill be now read a third time.</p>- The majority voted to pass the bill. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read it for a [third time](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). The bill will now go back to the House of Representatives, where our Members of Parliament (MPs) will decide whether or not they agree with the amendments that the Senate made. If they do agree, the bill will become law.
- ### What does the bill do?
- The main purpose of the [bill](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5822) it to "*repeal the requirement for the [Fair Work Commission](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Work_Commission) (FWC) to conduct four-yearly reviews of modern awards from the beginning of 1 January 2018*", though it makes other changes as well. Read more about the bill and the reasons it was introduced in the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1617a/17bd115).
<p>The government can no longer support the Fair Work Amendment (Repeal of 4 Yearly Reviews and Other Measures) Bill 2017, given it contains these entirely unrelated amendments relating to penalty rates. This is nothing more and nothing less than a stunt by the Labor Party. Labor doesn't care about penalty rates. If it did, it would immediately demand that all unions who have done deals with big businesses to cut penalty rates repay those workers. This is nothing more and nothing less than a stunt by Labor and the Greens, and the government will not support it and we will not be supporting the amended bill.</p> <p class="speaker">Doug Cameron</p><p>I take the view that this is exactly why people see the coalition as not being fit for government. They do not support penalty rates for workers. They want to attack working people in this country at every opportunity they get. And it's this minister who leads the charge every time she is on her feet—a disgraced minister, a minister who has misled this place at least five times and a minister who has engaged in a cover-up for her office and her actions over the last few weeks. This is a minister who has no credibility. This is a government with no credibility. This is a government that is chewing itself up. This is a government at war with itself. This is a government not fit to govern this country, a government who would attack the poorest people in this country—the working poor who depend on their penalty rates to put food on the table, get the kids off to school and put shoes on their kids' feet. This is a government who are supporting the cuts to penalty rates that allow them to do that. This is a government who deserve absolute condemnation. This is a government who will not last much longer. This is a government who, when we next go to the election, will get thrown out on their neck, because they are divided, they are partisan, they are ideologically driven and they don't have the views and the rights of ordinary working people in this is country at the forefront of their thoughts, ever. They are an absolute disgrace. This bill is so important; it's not a stunt. This is a bill that looks after 700,000 workers who are having their wages cut. This is a bill that ensures that workers can put food on the table, buy their kids some schoolbooks and maybe have a meal out once in a blue moon. Anyone who votes against this is saying to the ordinary working people in this country: 'We do not care for you. We do not care one iota for your welfare, your family.' This is a bad government and the sooner they go the better.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is that the bill be read a third time.</p><p class="italic"> <i>Senator Brown did not vote, to compensate for the vacancy caused by the resignation of Senator Parry.</i></p><p class="italic"> <i>Senator Collins did not vote, to compensate for the vacancy caused by the resignation of Senator Nash.</i></p><p class="italic"> <i>Senator Smith did not vote to compensate for the resignation caused by the vacancy of Senator Kakoschke-Moore</i></p>
|