All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2014-03-06#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-12-27 11:23:09
|
Title
Motions - Lock the Gate Alliance - Act of concerns of the Alliance- Motions - Lock the Gate Alliance - Act on concerns of the Alliance
Description
- The majority voted against acting on the concerns of [Lock the Gate](http://www.lockthegate.org.au/) (see the text of the [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2014-03-06.33.2) below).
- ### Text of the motion
- > *That the Senate—*
- > *(a) notes:*
- >> *(i) the serious concern shared by communities and experts across Australia about the significant risks coal and gas developments pose to our communities, public health, water resources and natural areas, and*
- >> *(ii) that in the week beginning 2 March 2014, a delegation of 16 community representatives from the [Lock the Gate](http://www.lockthegate.org.au/) network have [travelled to Canberra](http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/general/news/no-fracking-way-delegation-hits-canberra/2690278.aspx) from across the nation, seeking the support of their elected representatives to protect their communities, their water and their land; and*
- > *(b) calls on the Federal Government to urgently act on the concerns of the Lock the Gate network by:*
- >> *(i) passing national laws to protect food-producing land from coal and gas mining and give landholders the power of veto over mining on their land,*
- >> *(ii) protecting communities by establishing a national Environmental Protection Authority and a new Clean Air and Water Act; and*
>> *(iii) excluding from the [Trans Pacific Partnership](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership) Agreement any clause or instrument that undermines the power of Australian governments to protect land, water and communities.*- >> *(iii) excluding from the [Trans Pacific Partnership](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership) Agreement any clause or instrument that undermines the power of Australian governments to protect land, water and communities.*
|
|
senate vote 2014-03-06#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-12-27 11:22:33
|
Title
Motions — Lock the Gate Alliance- Motions - Lock the Gate Alliance - Act of concerns of the Alliance
Description
<p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted against acting on the concerns of [Lock the Gate](http://www.lockthegate.org.au/) (see the text of the [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2014-03-06.33.2) below).
- ### Text of the motion
- > *That the Senate—*
- > *(a) notes:*
- >> *(i) the serious concern shared by communities and experts across Australia about the significant risks coal and gas developments pose to our communities, public health, water resources and natural areas, and*
- >> *(ii) that in the week beginning 2 March 2014, a delegation of 16 community representatives from the [Lock the Gate](http://www.lockthegate.org.au/) network have [travelled to Canberra](http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/general/news/no-fracking-way-delegation-hits-canberra/2690278.aspx) from across the nation, seeking the support of their elected representatives to protect their communities, their water and their land; and*
- > *(b) calls on the Federal Government to urgently act on the concerns of the Lock the Gate network by:*
- >> *(i) passing national laws to protect food-producing land from coal and gas mining and give landholders the power of veto over mining on their land,*
- >> *(ii) protecting communities by establishing a national Environmental Protection Authority and a new Clean Air and Water Act; and*
- >> *(iii) excluding from the [Trans Pacific Partnership](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership) Agreement any clause or instrument that undermines the power of Australian governments to protect land, water and communities.*
<p class="italic">(a) notes:</p><p class="italic">(i) the serious concern shared by communities and experts across Australia about the significant risks coal and gas developments pose to our communities, public health, water resources and natural areas, and</p><p class="italic">(ii) that in the week beginning 2 March 2014, a delegation of 16 community representatives from the Lock the Gate network have travelled to Canberra from across the nation, seeking the support of their elected representatives to protect their communities, their water and their land; and</p><p class="italic">(b) calls on the Federal Government to urgently act on the concerns of the Lock the Gate network by:</p><p class="italic">(i) passing national laws to protect food-producing land from coal and gas mining and give landholders the power of veto over mining on their land,</p><p class="italic">(ii) protecting communities by establishing a national Environmental Protection Authority and a new Clean Air and Water Act, and</p><p class="italic">(iii) excluding from the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement any clause or instrument that undermines the power of Australian governments to protect land, water and communities.</p> <p class="speaker">Michael Ronaldson</p><p>Mr President, I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">John Hogg</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Michael Ronaldson</p><p>Resource development has long been the backbone of Australia's economy. The resources sector employs thousands of people and supports regional communities across Australia. Coal and gas provide the majority of Australia's energy needs. The development of resources must occur with the involvement of local communities. That is why this government supports the responsible development of resources under three co-existence principles: (1) access to prime agricultural land should only occur with the farmer's agreement; (2) there is no long-term damage to underground water supply; and (3) agricultural production is not permanently impaired. Again, I say: this government not only supports but expects the responsible development of resources, with appropriate rights for landholders, and we will continue to work closely with all stakeholders to provide leadership on this important issue.</p> <p class="speaker">John Hogg</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Waters be agreed to.</p>
|