26th Nov 2010, 9:59 AM – Senate Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 — In Committee — Definition of 'equivalence' (recommittal)

An equal number of senators voted in favour and against an amendment introduced by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, which means that it was unsuccessful because no majority was formed.

The amendment was a technical one that related to the meaning of the term "equivalence".(Read more about the amendment here, after 9:58 pm. ) This division is the second time the amendment has been voted on.(See the first time this amendment was put to division here. ) Liberal Senator Stephen Parry sought leave to recommit the vote (i.e. take the vote again) because his colleague, Senator Michael Ronaldson, was absent the first time round.(See that leave application here. )

Background to the bill

This bill was introduced following the lapse of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 and relates to the regulation of consumer protection, competition and licensing in telecommunications markets. According to the bills digest, significant changes made by this bill include:

• improving the conditions for competition in telecommunications markets by requiring Telstra to be structurally or functionally separated
• making the telecommunications access regime less susceptible to deliberate delay and obstruction
• removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets
• clarifying the universal service obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) to make it more enforceable
• extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra, and
• enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by issuing infringement notices.(More information about the bill is available in its bills digest.)

With these measures, the bill seeks to address the issues that result from the monopoly caused by Telstra's vertically and horizontally integrated telecommunications network.

Although this bill is substantially the same as the earlier bill of the same name, it does have some additional provisions.