18th Sep 2007, 6:07 PM – Senate Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Bill 2007 and others - In Committee - Remove discrimination
Summary
EditThe majority voted against Democrats amendments (1) and (2), which means they failed.
The amendments related to definitions of the words "de facto relationship" and "beneficiary relationship" to remove discrimination against same-sex couples. Australian Democrats Senator Andrew Murray explained that:
The amendments I refer to arise directly from, and are closely aligned to, the precise and detailed recommendations of the May 2007 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission report Same-sex: same entitlements [2.5MB]. That was a national inquiry into discrimination against people in same-sex relationships—their financial and work related entitlements and benefits. This is the first tax bill that I could put these amendments to.
Amendments text
(1) Schedule 5, page 98 (after line 17), before item 27, insert:
26A Subsection 10(2)
Insert:
de facto relationship means a relationship between two people living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis, where the relationship is not a marital relationship:
(a) in determining whether two people are in a de facto relationship, the circumstances of the relationship must be considered as a whole. Without limiting the generality of this paragraph, those circumstances may include:
(i) the length of their relationship;
(ii) how long and under what circumstances they have lived together;
(iii) whether there is a sexual relationship between them;
(iv) their degree of financial dependence or interdependence, and any arrangements for financial support, between or by them;
(v) the ownership, use and acquisition of their property, including any property that they own individually;
(vi) their degree of mutual commitment to a shared life;
(vii) whether they mutually care for and support children;
(viii) the performance of household duties;
(ix) the reputation, and public aspects, of the relationship between them;
(x) the existence of a statutory declaration signed by both persons stating that they regard themselves to be in a de facto relationship with the other person;
(b) a de facto relationship may be between two people of the same gender.
Note: A person in a marital relationship is taken to be legally married - see subsection 8A(2) of the Superannuation Act 1976.
(2) Schedule 7, page 112 (after line 26), after item 65, insert:
65A Subsection 995-1
Insert:
beneficiary relationship for the purposes of this Act, a person had a beneficiary relationship with another person at a particular time if the person has a marital or de facto relationship with the person and ordinarily lived with that other person on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis at that time.
65B Subsection 995-1(1)
Insert:
de facto relationship means a relationship between two people living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis, where the relationship is not a marital relationship:
(a) in determining whether two people are in a de facto relationship, the circumstances of the relationship must be considered as a whole. Without limiting the generality of this paragraph, those circumstances may include:
(i) the length of their relationship;
(ii) how long and under what circumstances they have lived together;
(iii) whether there is a sexual relationship between them;
(iv) their degree of financial dependence or interdependence, and any arrangements for financial support, between or by them;
(v) the ownership, use and acquisition of their property, including any property that they own individually;
(vi) their degree of mutual commitment to a shared life;
(vii) whether they mutually care for and support children;
(viii) the performance of household duties;
(ix) the reputation, and public aspects, of the relationship between them;
(x) the existence of a statutory declaration signed by both persons stating that they regard themselves to be in a de facto relationship with the other person;
(b) a de facto relationship may be between two people of the same gender;
(c) to avoid doubt, two people may still be in a de facto relationship if they are living apart from each other on a temporary basis.
65C Subsection 995-1(1)
At the end of the definition of spouse, add “and includes a person who is in a beneficiary relationship”.
Votes Not passed by a small majority
Nobody rebelled against their party.
Party | Votes | |
---|---|---|
Australian Democrats (100% turnout) | 4 Yes – 0 No | |
Lyn Allison Victoria | Yes | |
Andrew Bartlett Queensland | Yes | |
Andrew Murray WA | Yes | |
Natasha Stott Despoja SA | Yes | |
Australian Greens (100% turnout) | 4 Yes – 0 No | |
Bob Brown Tasmania | Yes | |
Christine Milne Tasmania | Yes | |
Kerry Nettle NSW | Yes | |
Rachel Siewert WA | Yes | |
Australian Labor Party (89% turnout) | 24 Yes – 0 No | |
Mark Bishop WA | Yes | |
Carol Brown Tasmania | Yes | |
George Campbell NSW | Yes | |
Kim Carr Victoria | Yes | |
Stephen Conroy Victoria | Yes | |
Trish Crossin NT | Yes | |
John Faulkner NSW | Yes | |
Annette Hurley SA | Yes | |
Steve Hutchins NSW | Yes | |
Linda Kirk SA | Yes | |
Joe Ludwig Queensland | Yes | |
Kate Lundy ACT | Yes | |
Gavin Marshall Victoria | Yes | |
Anne McEwen SA | Yes | |
Jan McLucas Queensland | Yes | |
Claire Moore Queensland | Yes | |
Kerry O'Brien Tasmania | Yes | |
Helen Polley Tasmania | Yes | |
Robert Ray Victoria | Yes | |
Nick Sherry Tasmania | Yes | |
Glenn Sterle WA | Yes | |
Ruth Webber WA | Yes | |
Penny Wong SA | Yes | |
Dana Wortley SA | Yes | |
Chris Evans WA | Absent | |
Michael Forshaw NSW | Absent | |
Ursula Stephens NSW | Absent | |
Nigel Scullion NT Country Liberal Party | No | |
John Hogg Queensland Deputy President | Yes | |
Steve Fielding Victoria Family First Party | No | |
Liberal Party (94% turnout) | 0 Yes – 30 No | |
Eric Abetz Tasmania | No | |
Judith Adams WA | No | |
Guy Barnett Tasmania | No | |
Cory Bernardi SA | No | |
Simon Birmingham SA | No | |
Sue Boyce Queensland | No | |
George Brandis Queensland | No | |
David Bushby Tasmania | No | |
Grant Chapman SA | No | |
Richard Colbeck Tasmania | No | |
Helen Coonan NSW | No | |
Mathias Cormann WA | No | |
Alan Eggleston WA | No | |
Chris Ellison WA | No | |
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells NSW | No | |
Mitch Fifield Victoria | No | |
Mary Fisher SA | No | |
Bill Heffernan NSW | No | |
Gary Humphries ACT | No | |
David Johnston WA | No | |
Ross Lightfoot WA | No | |
Ian Macdonald Queensland | No | |
Brett Mason Queensland | No | |
Nick Minchin SA | No | |
Stephen Parry Tasmania | No | |
Kay Patterson Victoria | No | |
Marise Payne NSW | No | |
Michael Ronaldson Victoria | No | |
Russell Trood Queensland | No | |
John Watson Tasmania | No | |
Rod Kemp Victoria | Absent | |
Judith Troeth Victoria | Absent | |
National Party (80% turnout) | 0 Yes – 4 No | |
Ron Boswell Queensland | No | |
Barnaby Joyce Queensland | No | |
Julian McGauran Victoria | No | |
Fiona Nash NSW | No | |
Sandy Macdonald NSW | Absent | |
Alan Ferguson SA President | No | |
Totals (92% turnout) | 33 Yes – 37 No |
Turnout is the percentage of members eligible to vote that did vote.