We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Lines voted on supporting Israel
How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should support Israel internationally and use its voting power in bodies such as the United Nations to demonstrate this support
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.
Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Sue Lines could have attended.
Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
28th Feb 2024, 5:18 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Export of military equipment to Israel |
absent | No |
6th Feb 2024, 5:53 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East - ICJ case against Israel |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2023, 5:15 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Oppose invasion of Gaza |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2023, 9:11 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Support |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2023, 9:06 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Condemn war crimes |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2017, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Human Rights Council - Re-focus |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2017, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations: Membership - UNESCO & anti-Israeli bias |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sue Lines has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.