We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Lines voted on maintaining or increasing defence spending
How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should keep up or increase the amount of money it spends on defence
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which Sue Lines could have attended.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th May 2017, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Fund diplomatic network and aid |
absent | No |
22nd Mar 2017 – Senate Motions - Defence Expenditure - Redirect |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sue Lines was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.