Compare how Sue Lines and Kimberley Kitching voted on MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which either Sue Lines or Kimberley Kitching could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines and Kimberley Kitching on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Lines	Kimberley Kitching	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which either Sue Lines or Kimberley Kitching could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Lines	Kimberley Kitching	Supporters vote
28th Nov 2018, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Coalmines in the Galilee Basin - Refuse	No	No	No
27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment	No	No	No