How Slade Brockman voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament should immediately introduce and debate legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission, or national integrity commission, that would detect, investigate and prevent corruption at a federal level (NB: this policy is related to our other policy, called "For creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission")

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Slade Brockman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Slade Brockman on this policy.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Slade Brockman could have attended.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote

30th Nov 2021, 12:38 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2021

No Yes

21st Oct 2021, 11:25 AM – Senate Motions - National Integrity Commission - National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2)

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Slade Brockman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.