Photo of Slade Brockman

We can't say anything concrete about how Slade Brockman voted on reducing air pollution

How Slade Brockman voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Slade Brockman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Slade Brockman on this policy.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Slade Brockman could have attended.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote

13th May 2020, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - Transport Infrastructure - Funding for active transport (cycling, walking etc)

absent Yes

27th Nov 2018, 1:58 PM – Senate Road Vehicle Standards Bill 2018 and others - Second Reading - Reduce vehicle emissions

absent Yes

15th Aug 2018, 5:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Product Emissions Standards (Excise) Charges Regulations 2018, Product Emissions Standards (Customs) Charges Regulations 2018 - Disallow

absent No

10th May 2018, 12:44 PM – Senate Interstate Road Transport Legislation (Repeal) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Address emissions

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Slade Brockman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.