We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Ludlam voted on decreasing government funding for private schools
How Scott Ludlam voted compared to someone who agrees that private schools (also known as independent or non-government schools) should not receive significant funding from the government
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing government funding for private schools” which Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ludlam on this policy.
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing government funding for private schools” which Scott Ludlam could have attended.
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Feb 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Needs-based funding model |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Scott Ludlam has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.