We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Ludlam voted on transgender rights
How Scott Ludlam voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ludlam on this policy.
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Scott Ludlam could have attended.
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Jun 2013, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions — International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Scott Ludlam has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.