We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Ludlam voted on buffer zones around abortion clinics
How Scott Ludlam voted compared to someone who agrees that protests shouldn't be allowed close to abortion clinics
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for buffer zones around abortion clinics” which Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ludlam on this policy.
Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for buffer zones around abortion clinics” which Scott Ludlam could have attended.
Division | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
9th Nov 2015, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions — Freedom of Speech |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Ludlam was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.