Compare how Scott Ludlam and Peter Whish-Wilson voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Scott Ludlam or Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ludlam and Peter Whish-Wilson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ludlam	Peter Whish-Wilson	Supporters vote
21st Nov 2012 – Senate Water Amendment (Long-term Average Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Adjustments	Yes	Yes	No
20th Nov 2012, 9:59 PM – Senate Water Amendment (Long-term Average Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Adoption of amendments	Yes	Yes	No
20th Nov 2012, 9:41 PM – Senate Water Amendment (Long-term Average Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Ground water amendment	Yes	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Scott Ludlam or Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ludlam	Peter Whish-Wilson	Supporters vote
25th Feb 2020, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Protect water	-	Yes	No
11th Sep 2019, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Moratorium	-	Yes	No
11th Sep 2019, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Crisis	-	Yes	No
3rd Apr 2019, 1:03 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Repeal 1,500 GL limit	-	Yes	No
14th Feb 2019 – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission - Reform needed	-	Yes	No
25th Jun 2018, 9:17 PM – Senate Water Amendment Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	-	No	Yes
25th Jun 2018, 8:36 PM – Senate Water Amendment Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	-	No	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 7:14 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Basin Plan Amendment Instrument 2017 (No. 1) - Disallow	-	Yes	No
7th Feb 2013, 12:38 PM – Senate Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Buyback cap	No	No	Yes
6th Feb 2013, 12:44 PM – Senate Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Timeframe	Yes	Yes	No
6th Feb 2013, 12:34 PM – Senate Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Up to 450 Gigalitres	No	No	Yes
6th Feb 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Socioeconomic outcomes	No	No	Yes
6th Feb 2013, 10:44 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Buybacks	No	No	Yes
21st Nov 2012, 10:36 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Long-term Average Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Protection of communities	No	No	Yes
21st Nov 2012, 9:39 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Long-term Average Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Modelling	Yes	Yes	No
20th Aug 2012, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - 4000 gigalitres required	Yes	Yes	No
9th May 2012, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Average annual inflows	No	-	Yes