We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Lightfoot voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use
How Ross Lightfoot voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase water allocations from the Murray-Darling Basin for farmers and other users
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Lightfoot on this policy.
| Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended.
| Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences |
absent | No |
26th Mar 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - World Day for Water - South Australian wetlands |
absent | No |
7th Dec 2006, 10:03 AM – Senate Motions - Wetlands and Floodplains - Murray Darling |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ross Lightfoot was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.