We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Lightfoot voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water
How Ross Lightfoot voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the protection of Australia's fresh water resources, including its river and groundwater systems
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Lightfoot on this policy.
| Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended.
| Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences |
absent | Yes |
26th Mar 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - World Day for Water - South Australian wetlands |
absent | Yes |
8th Feb 2007, 10:42 AM – Senate Motions - Water - Macquarie River |
No | Yes |
7th Dec 2006, 10:03 AM – Senate Motions - Wetlands and Floodplains - Murray Darling |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ross Lightfoot has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.