How Rod Culleton voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be more independent access to detention centres and more information provided about the management of asylum seekers under Australian government policy, including the interception of boats at sea

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which Rod Culleton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rod Culleton on this policy.

Division Rod Culleton Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which Rod Culleton could have attended.

Division Rod Culleton Supporters vote

12th Sep 2016, 4:48 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Nauru & Manus Island centres

absent Yes

1st Sep 2016, 12:45 PM – Senate Motions - Immigration Detention - Nauru documents

No Yes

31st Aug 2016, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Immigration Detention - Royal Commission

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Rod Culleton has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.