How Rachel Siewert voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support MacMines' plans to build the China Stone coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rachel Siewert on this policy.

Division Rachel Siewert Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Rachel Siewert could have attended.

Division Rachel Siewert Supporters vote

27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment

Yes No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Rachel Siewert has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.