We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Georgiou voted on reproductive bodily autonomy
How Peter Georgiou voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that Australian laws protect the reproductive bodily autonomy of women and other people capable of childbearing by, for example, protecting them from pregnancy-related discrimination and ensuring they have access to pregnancy-related healthcare services, which include affordable contraception, maternity care and abortion services
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Peter Georgiou could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Georgiou on this policy.
| Division | Peter Georgiou | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Peter Georgiou could have attended.
| Division | Peter Georgiou | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Feb 2018, 4:41 PM – Senate Motions - Abortion - Alternatives and counselling |
absent | No |
7th Feb 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Reproductive Health Services - Availability of abortion services |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Georgiou was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.