We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Georgiou voted on same-sex marriage equality
How Peter Georgiou voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should amend the Marriage Act 1961 so that same-sex couples can marry under Australian law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Peter Georgiou could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Georgiou on this policy.
Division | Peter Georgiou | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
29th Nov 2017, 1:30 PM – Senate Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Peter Georgiou could have attended.
Division | Peter Georgiou | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Georgiou was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.