We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire to end the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023, which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2023, 5:04 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East - Ceasefire |
absent | Yes |
7th Nov 2023, 4:50 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Immediate ceasefire |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2023, 9:06 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Condemn war crimes |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Dodson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.