We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on no new fossil fuels projects
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban all new fossil fuel projects (oil, gas, coal) (for those votes that relate specifically to new thermal coal mines, see the policy "for banning new thermal coal mines")
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 5:56 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - in Committee - No new fossil fuel facilities |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 10:00 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Acknowledge need to end fossil fuels |
No | Yes |
13th May 2021, 2:48 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Extension and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - New fossil fuel projects |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects |
absent | Yes |
9th Sep 2019, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - Fossil Fuel Basins - Halt development |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Patrick Dodson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.