We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on increasing federal government support for childcare
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial support for childcare and early childhood eduction by, for example, supporting increased wages for workers and providing grants for not-for-profit community child care initiatives
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Feb 2019, 5:59 PM – Senate Motions - In Home Care Program - Emergency relief required |
absent | Yes |
7th Sep 2017, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Acknowledge work & increase pay |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Dodson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.