We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on changing the date of Australia Day
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the date of Australia Day should be changed from 26 January, which was the day the First Fleet arrived at Port Jackson, Sydney, and is a day of mourning for many Australians
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for changing the date of Australia Day” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for changing the date of Australia Day” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2018, 11:58 AM – Senate Motions - Australia Day - Change the date |
absent | Yes |
6th Dec 2017, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Australia Day - Consultation on changing the date |
absent | Yes |
29th Nov 2017, 4:19 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Triple J's Hottest 100 + Australia Day |
absent | No |
29th Nov 2017, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Triple J's Hottest 100 + Australia Day |
absent | Yes |
13th Nov 2017, 7:53 PM – Senate Regulations - Citizenship (Authorisation) Revocation and Authorisation Instrument 2017 and another - Disallow |
Yes | Yes |
17th Aug 2017, 12:45 PM – Senate Motions - Australia Day - City of Yarra Council |
absent | No |
9th Feb 2017, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Australia Day - Change the date |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Patrick Dodson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.