We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2021, 5:32 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference - Great Barrier Reef |
absent | Yes |
10th Aug 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Documents - Minister for the Environment - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
27th Feb 2020, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
3rd Dec 2019, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
24th Jul 2019, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Protect from climate change |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 4:46 PM – Senate Motions - East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery - Add conditions to accreditation |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Dodson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.