We can't say anything concrete about how Michaelia Cash voted on reducing waste in Australia
How Michaelia Cash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take steps to reduce the amount of waste being generated and exported by Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing waste in Australia” which Michaelia Cash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michaelia Cash on this policy.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing waste in Australia” which Michaelia Cash could have attended.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2020, 9:46 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Plastic packaging |
absent | Yes |
7th Dec 2020, 9:34 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Stronger labelling |
absent | Yes |
7th Dec 2020, 8:52 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Mandate |
absent | Yes |
7th Dec 2020, 8:52 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Single-use plastics |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2012, 11:26 AM – Senate Environment Protection (Beverage Container Deposit and Recovery Scheme) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill |
absent | Yes |
17th Nov 2010, 5:09 PM – Senate Motions - Non Biodegradable Plastic Bags - Ban |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Michaelia Cash has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.