We can't say anything concrete about how Michaelia Cash voted on an independent Australian Federal Police
How Michaelia Cash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have enough independence so that they can carry out their duties in relation to politically sensitive matters
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Michaelia Cash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michaelia Cash on this policy.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Michaelia Cash could have attended.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jul 2019, 3:46 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michaelia Cash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.