We can't say anything concrete about how Michaelia Cash voted on an independent ABC
How Michaelia Cash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is independent and free of political interference
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent ABC” which Michaelia Cash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michaelia Cash on this policy.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent ABC” which Michaelia Cash could have attended.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2023, 11:44 AM – Senate Documents - Australian Broadcasting Corporation Coronation coverage - Order for the Production of Documents |
Yes | No |
16th Oct 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee - Refer to Committee (ABC + political interference) |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2018, 3:41 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Refer to Committee (ABC + political interference) |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Michaelia Cash has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.