We can't say anything concrete about how Michaelia Cash voted on recognising local government in the Constitution
How Michaelia Cash voted compared to someone who agrees that local government should be recognised in the Australian Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Michaelia Cash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michaelia Cash on this policy.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2013, 8:19 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2013, 8:11 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Michaelia Cash could have attended.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michaelia Cash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.