How Matt O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt O'Sullivan on this policy.

Division Matt O'Sullivan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended.

Division Matt O'Sullivan Supporters vote

17th Jun 2020, 4:13 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Resettlement

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Matt O'Sullivan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.