We can't say anything concrete about how Matt O'Sullivan voted on targeting foreign interference in Australia
How Matt O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the issue of foreign interference in Australia by, for example, introducing new offences against acts such as sabotage, treason and espionage
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt O'Sullivan on this policy.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2019, 4:09 PM – Senate Committees - Economics References Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Matt O'Sullivan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.