We can't say anything concrete about how Matt O'Sullivan voted on letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)
How Matt O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt O'Sullivan on this policy.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Feb 2025, 3:37 PM – Senate Motions - National Security - Make a statement |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Matt O'Sullivan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.