We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should make it legal for citizens to use marijuana (cannabis) for health and recreational purposes
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 11:06 AM – Senate Narcotic Drugs (Licence Charges) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Amnesty from criminal prosecution |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Louise Pratt has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.