We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Feb 2025, 3:37 PM – Senate Motions - National Security - Make a statement |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Louise Pratt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.