We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on local community consultation on infrastructure projects
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should always consult with local communities that may be affected by infrastructure projects, especially for major infrastructure projects such as dams, pulp mills or nuclear facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2014, 9:38 PM – Senate Infrastructure Australia Amendment Bill 2013 - in Committee - Local community consultation |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Louise Pratt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.