We can't say anything concrete about how Judith Adams voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
How Judith Adams voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Judith Adams could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Judith Adams on this policy.
| Division | Judith Adams | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Judith Adams could have attended.
| Division | Judith Adams | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Judith Adams was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.