We can't say anything concrete about how Judith Adams voted on increasing political transparency
How Judith Adams voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Judith Adams could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Judith Adams on this policy.
| Division | Judith Adams | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Mar 2009, 12:19 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Judith Adams could have attended.
| Division | Judith Adams | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2007, 10:37 AM – Senate Motions - Government Accountability and Transparency - Canadian bill |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Judith Adams has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.