We can't say anything concrete about how Jordon Steele-John voted on a Royal Commission into Robodebt
How Jordon Steele-John voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate the government's Robodebt scheme, officially known as the Online Compliance Intervention, which related to automated debt recovery
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Robodebt” which Jordon Steele-John could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jordon Steele-John on this policy.
| Division | Jordon Steele-John | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Robodebt” which Jordon Steele-John could have attended.
| Division | Jordon Steele-John | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Dec 2020, 5:05 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Robodebt |
Yes | Yes |
27th Aug 2020 – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Establish Robodebt Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2020, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Establish Royal Commission into Robodebt |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jordon Steele-John has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.