Compare how Joe Bullock and Matthew Canavan voted on a carbon price

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a carbon price” which either Joe Bullock or Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Bullock and Matthew Canavan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Bullock	Matthew Canavan	Supporters vote
17th Jul 2014, 11:10 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time	No	Yes	No
17th Jul 2014, 10:51 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills — Adoption of Report — Adopt the report	No	Yes	No
17th Jul 2014, 10:46 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills — In Committee — Bills stand as printed	No	Yes	No
15th Jul 2014, 9:36 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	Yes	No
10th Jul 2014, 12:23 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - In Committee - Adopt the committee's report and so reject the bills	Yes	No	Yes
10th Jul 2014, 12:16 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - In Committee - Agree to bills	No	Yes	No
9th Jul 2014, 11:46 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a carbon price” which either Joe Bullock or Matthew Canavan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Bullock	Matthew Canavan	Supporters vote
18th Mar 2021, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Trade with the European Union - Emissions reduction targets	-	No	Yes
22nd Feb 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Carbon market	-	No	Yes
28th Nov 2018, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Carbon price	-	No	Yes
17th Jul 2014, 10:24 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 — In Committee — Keep schedules 2 to 4	No	Yes	No
10th Jul 2014, 11:56 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] - In Committee - Schedules 2 to 5	No	Yes	No
10th Jul 2014, 9:59 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Declaration of Urgency - Allocate time for debate	No	Yes	No
10th Jul 2014, 9:52 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Declaration of Urgency - Declare bills urgent	No	Yes	No
9th Jul 2014, 11:29 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Second Reading - Reject the bills	No	No	Yes
9th Jul 2014, 9:47 AM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Declaration of Urgency - Consider these bills urgent	No	Yes	No
7th Jul 2014, 1:29 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - First Reading - Consider bills together	No	Yes	No
7th Jul 2014, 1:25 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - First Reading - Proceed without formality	No	Yes	No