Compare how Joe Bullock and Jo Lindgren voted on increasing marine conservation

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Joe Bullock or Jo Lindgren could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Bullock and Jo Lindgren on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Bullock	Jo Lindgren	Supporters vote
12th Feb 2015, 1:38 PM – Senate Bills – Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 – in Committee – Amendment: extend protections to all threatened species	No	-	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Joe Bullock or Jo Lindgren could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Bullock	Jo Lindgren	Supporters vote
2nd Mar 2016, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - Protection of Shark Species - Full protection to five species	Yes	No	Yes
15th Oct 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Release Environmental Plan	absent	No	Yes
7th Sep 2015, 3:45 PM – Senate Refer 'supertrawlers' to the Environment and Communications References Committee	Yes	No	Yes