Compare how David Johnston and Anne McEwen voted on an emissions reduction fund

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which either David Johnston or Anne McEwen could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Johnston and Anne McEwen on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Johnston	Anne McEwen	Supporters vote
30th Oct 2014, 9:04 PM – Senate Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which either David Johnston or Anne McEwen could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Johnston	Anne McEwen	Supporters vote
30th Oct 2014, 9:01 PM – Senate Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Criticise the Direct Action policy	No	Yes	No