We can't say anything concrete about how Christopher Back voted on making sanitary items GST-free
How Christopher Back voted compared to someone who agrees that GST should not be charged on sanitary items (such as tampons and pads) as they are health products
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making sanitary items GST-free” which Christopher Back could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Christopher Back on this policy.
| Division | Christopher Back | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2017, 12:07 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (GST Low Value Goods) Bill 2017 - in Committee - No GST on sanitary items |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making sanitary items GST-free” which Christopher Back could have attended.
| Division | Christopher Back | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2017, 11:32 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Gst Low Value Goods) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Delay the bill |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Christopher Back has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.