Compare how Christopher Back and John Hogg voted on increasing marine conservation
Christopher Back
Former Liberal Party Senator for WA March 2009 – July 2017
John Hogg
Former President Senator for Queensland August 2008 – June 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Christopher Back or John Hogg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Christopher Back and John Hogg on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Christopher Back | John Hogg | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
12th Feb 2015, 1:38 PM – Senate Bills – Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 – in Committee – Amendment: extend protections to all threatened species |
absent | - | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Christopher Back or John Hogg could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".