How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to protect people who disclose information for the benefit of the public interest

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.

Division Chris Evans Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Chris Evans could have attended.

Division Chris Evans Supporters vote

19th Mar 2013, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - Public Interest Disclosure - Protect whistle blowers

No Yes

8th Feb 2007, 10:37 AM – Senate Motions - Government Accountability and Transparency - Canadian bill

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Chris Evans has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.