We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on an NBN (using fibre to the premises)
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a National Broadband Network ('NBN') using the fibre to the premises ('FTTP') design
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an NBN (using fibre to the premises)” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an NBN (using fibre to the premises)” which Chris Evans could have attended.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
15th Sep 2011 – Senate National Broadband Network Financial Transparency Bill 2010 (No. 2) — Second Reading — Read a second time |
absent | No |
24th Mar 2011, 4:53 PM – Senate National Broadband Network Companies Bill 2010 and related bill — In Committee - Report progress |
absent | No |
24th Mar 2011, 3:54 PM – Senate National Broadband Network Companies Bill 2010 and related bill — Second Reading — Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Evans was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.