We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on increasing funding for university education
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Chris Evans could have attended.
Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
20th Nov 2012, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - University of Western Sydney - Retain current courses and academic staffing resources |
absent | Yes |
28th Feb 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Increase base funding |
absent | Yes |
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Education Funding - Increase public higher education funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Evans was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.